

NOT - r u kidding? (Almost) NOTHING is (unintentionally) misspelled in my submission (yes, i missed the double "ii" - big deal - if my submission was an ad i think i would have caught it - especially since i would not use the wording it hid in) (u gonna gig me 4 the missing period?) ((What i did not expect was Whiterabbit-uk getting a difference of 150+- "points" - that's AMAZING.))īTW: i did find your comment useful - thank you. my comment is for the "authors" and i submitted it QUICKLY so that other naysayers could just skip their comments. i thoroughly agree that some should TEST and evaluate the GOTDs (perhaps in sandboxes.). and then: IF i GO TO THE SHED FOR A RAKE - IT BETTER HAVE TINES!!! This "software" does not muster up to even consideration imltho (in my less than humble opinion) - BUT i LEFT THAT PART OFF for benefit of others - even you. PS: Befour ewe blaim sumwun uf missspelll ewe beter chec - u mite b messsing width sumwun width - please read the preceding. READ last sentence: Just a friendly reminder to consider your target group(s) and bring roses instead of plums… i'm NOT (per se) - i'm pointing out - TO THEIR benefit IF THEY WILL READ WITH DISCRETION (unlike and his ilk)). r u kidding? (Almost) NOTHING is (unintentionally) misspelled in my submission (yes, i missed the double "ii" - big deal - if my submission was an ad i think i would have caught it - especially since i would not use the wording it hid in) (u gonna gig me 4 the missing period?)
